Radiofrequency · Focused ultrasound · Facial laxity

Thermage vs Ultherapy

Broad heating against focused points

No trial has put one clearly ahead of the other. The choice depends on where your laxity sits and how much facial fat you have. Results vary.

Exam
Before Any Plan
Doctor
Examines You First
Written
Quote After Exam
Orchard
By Appointment

In Brief

Thermage and Ultherapy offer a choice between broad radiofrequency heating and focused ultrasound points. Thermage often fits crêpey skin on the face and eyes. Ultherapy fits deeper laxity along the jawline and under the chin. Neither adds volume, and lean faces risk hollowing. Results vary.

At a Glance: Thermage vs Ultherapy

What it comparesThermage, broad radiofrequency heating, and Ultherapy, focused ultrasound points at set depths.
Used forThermage for crêpey skin on face and eyes; Ultherapy for deeper jawline laxity.
Not suited toUltherapy and HIFU are not used on a lean face here.
StudiesTwo small head-to-head trials could not separate them on laxity.
What it cannot doNeither device adds volume, removes fat or removes excess skin.
Main risksAll three of Ultherapy, HIFU and Thermage can leave a face looking hollow.

What the Research Shows: Thermage vs Ultherapy

  • A 2025 Merz-funded meta-analysis of 42 studies reported investigator-rated improvement in 89% (n=411) and mean pain of 4.85/10; authors said neutral responses may overestimate efficacy. [1]
  • A 2004 pilot tissue study in two abdominoplasty volunteers reported immediate collagen fibril contraction and increased collagen I mRNA, with no observable light-microscopy changes at 3 or 8 weeks. [2]
  • A 2024 single-treatment study of 20 Asian women reported dermatologist-rated jowl and nasolabial laxity improvement at 12 and 24 weeks, no burns or scarring, and no significant change in pores or wrinkles. [3]
  • A 2023 systematic review of 16 studies, mostly in women, reported investigator-rated improvement in 92% at day 90; treatment was moderately painful, transient redness was common, and other adverse effects affected 2%. [4]

Figures describe published study groups, which may have used other devices or protocols. They do not predict your result. Updated 3 November 2026.

About This Treatment

The short answer

These are two different ways of heating tissue. Ultherapy places focused points of ultrasound heat at set depths. Thermage heats the deeper skin broadly with radiofrequency. Two small head-to-head trials could not separate them on laxity.

So the useful question is which one fits your face, if either does. Dr Sin Yong looks at two things: where the laxity sits, and how much facial fat you have. He performs both himself, and for some faces he advises neither.

Thermage vs Ultherapy at a glance

Ultherapy

Made by Merz. Microfocused ultrasound with real-time imaging to 8 mm, performed here on Ultherapy Prime. See Ultherapy.

Thermage FLX

Made by Solta Medical. Monopolar radiofrequency at 6.78 MHz, with cryogen spray cooling the surface. See Thermage.

Where the heat goes

Ultherapy depths

Focused points at about 4.5 mm in the muscle-and-fascia layer, 3.0 mm in the deep dermis and 1.5 mm in the superficial dermis.

Thermage heating

Current runs through the skin to a return pad. It warms the deeper dermis and its fibrous septa over a broad area.

How the choice is made

Deeper laxity

Along the jawline and under the chin, Ultherapy may fit, because it reaches the deeper layer directly. It is for mild to moderate laxity in a face that has kept its volume.

Skin quality and crêpiness

Thermage is often a closer fit. It is used here for the face and eyelids, with different single-use tips.

Lean or hollow faces

Ultherapy and HIFU are not used on a lean face here. The VF Lift on Volnewmer takes their place.

Puffier or heavier faces

He generally uses Time Freeze Laser LCLR®.

The neck

Dr Sin Yong does not use Thermage on the neck. He uses the VF Lift and Time Freeze Laser LCLR® there.

Who should wait or avoid them

Ultherapy

Wait if pregnant or breastfeeding, with open wounds, active infection or inflamed acne in the area, or recent filler or threads in the zone. A pacemaker or implanted electronic device needs assessment first.

Thermage

Wait if pregnant, or with infected, broken or inflamed skin, an active cold sore or an eczema flare. Anyone with a pacemaker, implantable defibrillator or other implanted electronic device is not treated.

Plan changes for Thermage

Nearby metal implants, recent filler or threads, heat-sensitive skin conditions, slow healing or reduced sensation.

What neither can do

Neither device adds volume, removes fat or removes excess skin. Significant skin excess or heavy jowls go to a plastic surgery specialist. Ultherapy does not resurface the skin or replace a surgical facelift. Thermage does not reposition deeper tissue, lift a descended brow, remove a lower-lid fat bag or relax neck bands. It also does not help eyelid droop caused by the muscle.

Risks and side effects

All three of Ultherapy, HIFU and Thermage can leave a face looking hollow. Lean faces are most exposed, as stray heat may reach fat that was never the aim. After Ultherapy, redness, swelling, bruising and tenderness are normal. Less often there are surface burns, temporary nerve irritation that can cause weakness, or fat atrophy. After Thermage, expect redness, warmth, mild swelling and tenderness, and eyelids may stay puffy for longer. Small welts, bruising or temporary numbness are less common. Superficial burns, blisters, crusting or a contour dip are rare.

What the studies show

A split-face trial of 20 patients found both improved laxity over six months, with no significant difference. A neck trial of 20 patients also found no significant difference, and ultrasound was more painful. Both trials were small. One lower-face study found weaker outcomes in patients with a BMI above 30.

Recovery

After Ultherapy, redness usually settles as the skin cools. Tenderness, mild swelling, occasional numbness or tingling and small bruises can last for a while. Ordinary activities, make-up and skincare can resume. After Thermage, redness and swelling come first, with tenderness that evening, easing over the following days. Any result builds gradually as new collagen forms. Please ask for review if a ridge does not flatten, a blister forms, or you notice new facial weakness or numbness that is not improving.

Sessions and fees

There is no fixed number of sessions, and any repeat is decided at review. No duration of result is promised. Fees are not published. For Ultherapy they depend on zones, number of lines, doctor time, any combined treatment and review. For Thermage they depend on tip and pulses, areas, any combined protocol and review. A written quote follows at consultation.

Frequently Asked Questions

No trial has put one clearly ahead. The two small comparisons showed no significant gap on laxity. What matters is the fit with your face.
In one neck trial, ultrasound was more painful than radiofrequency. How it feels depends on the settings, the area treated and you.
Yes, and lean faces are most exposed. Your facial fat is checked before any plan.
Yes, with limits. Both are done by Dr Sin Yong himself: Ultherapy Prime, and Thermage FLX for the face and eyelids. Lean faces are not given Ultherapy or HIFU, and necks are not given Thermage.
Ultherapy is not used on a lean face here. The VF Lift is the usual alternative.
Thermage is not used with a pacemaker or implanted electronic device. For Ultherapy, these need assessment first.
No. Neither removes excess skin. Heavy skin excess or jowls are referred to a plastic surgery specialist.
No length of result is promised for either treatment. Results vary, and any repeat is decided at review.
SY
Dr Sin Yong
MBBS (NUS) · MRCS (Edinburgh)
MSc Aesthetic Medicine (QMUL) · MSc Practical Dermatology (Cardiff)
Aesthetic physician registered with the Singapore Medical Council.

Face Lifting Consultation

Dr Sin Yong will examine you, explain your options and give any fee in writing.

WhatsApp the Clinic

References

  1. Amiri M, et al. Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization (MFU-V) Effectiveness and Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Aesthet Surg J. 2025;45(3):NP86-NP94. View source · DOI
  2. Zelickson BD, et al. Histological and Ultrastructural Evaluation of the Effects of a Radiofrequency-Based Nonablative Dermal Remodeling Device: A Pilot Study. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(2):204-209. View source · DOI · PMID 14967794
  3. Shin J, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Monopolar Radiofrequency for Tightening the Skin of Aged Faces. Cosmetics. 2024;11(3):71. View source · DOI
  4. Contini M, et al. A Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Microfocused Ultrasound for Facial Skin Tightening. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(2):1522. View source · DOI · PMID 36674277
  5. Hitchcock TM, Dobke MK Review of the safety profile for microfocused ultrasound with visualization. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2014;13(4):329-335. View source · DOI · PMID 25399626
  6. Burns JA Thermage: Monopolar Radiofrequency. Aesthet Surg J. 2005;25(6):638-642. View source · DOI · PMID 19338872

Studies may involve other devices or protocols, and they do not predict your own result. See our evidence library and editorial policy.

Related Treatments

Last updated 3 November 2026. General information only. Results vary between individuals. Images are illustrative and do not show patients.