Pigment · Laser pulses · Comparison

Pico vs Q Switched Laser

Pulse width decides how much heat is left

Pico pulses are shorter than Q switched pulses, so less heat spreads. A shorter pulse does not make treatment risk-free. Settings still matter. Results vary.

Exam
Before Any Plan
Doctor
Examines You First
Written
Quote After Exam
Orchard
By Appointment

In Brief

Pico vs Q switched laser is a comparison of pulse length. Pico suits discrete spots, freckles and texture work. Q switched low-fluence 1064 nm toning suits diffuse tone and brown acne marks. Neither deals with why pigment formed, and both can darken skin. Results vary.

At a Glance: Pico vs Q Switched Laser

What it comparesPicosecond pulses and Q switched, or nanosecond, laser pulses.
Main differenceA nanosecond pulse lasts roughly a thousand times longer than a picosecond pulse.
Used forPico for discrete spots and freckles; low-fluence 1064 nm toning for diffuse tone.
Who should waitA recent tan or sunburn, active infection, photosensitising medicines, keloid tendency or pregnancy.
What it cannot doNeither laser deals with why pigment formed or removes melasma.
Main risksPost-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, pale spots after repeated toning, and crusting.

What the Research Shows: Pico vs Q Switched Laser

  • A 2022 systematic review of 42 articles judged the laser generally effective, but reported mottled hypopigmentation occasionally persisting, hyperpigmentation with aggressive use, and a lack of long-term follow-up data. [3]
  • A 2023 randomised trial of 60 women reported week-24 MASI improvement of 35.9% with picosecond Nd:YAG, 25.5% with alexandrite and 24.0% with hydroquinone; four patients (6.8%) had recurrence. [4]
  • A 2022 randomised split-face trial, funded by Beiersdorf, of 59 patients with phototypes III to IV found no significant difference in pigmentation score between sunscreens after picosecond laser. [5]
  • A 2023 randomised split-face pilot of 31 Asian patients reported scar score reductions of 39.11% with picosecond laser and 43.73% with Er:YAG, and pigmentation in 1 versus 8 sides. [6]

Figures describe published study groups, which may have used other devices or protocols. They do not predict your result. Updated 3 November 2026.

About This Treatment

The short answer

Both lasers break up pigment. The difference is the pulse. A picosecond pulse lasts about a trillionth of a second. A Q switched, or nanosecond, pulse lasts about a billionth of a second, roughly a thousand times longer.

Pulse width decides how much energy turns to heat in the skin around the pigment. Here, the T2 Frax Radiance protocol on the DEKA TORO has picosecond and nanosecond emissions, so pulse width and wavelength are chosen per mark and per visit.

Pico vs Q switched laser at a glance

Pico (picosecond)Q switched (nanosecond)
PulseAbout a trillionth of a secondAbout a billionth of a second
Main effectPressure, with little heat spreadingMore heat, which spreads into nearby tissue
Common wavelengths532 nm and 1064 nm, and 785 nm picosecond on the DEKA TORO532 nm and 1064 nm
Often used forDiscrete sun spots and freckles, fractional texture work, tattoo inkLow-fluence 1064 nm toning for diffuse tone and brown acne marks
MelasmaConservative add-on onlyConservative low-fluence toning only
CautionFluence, spot size, passes, interval and sun still matterNeeds conservative settings and pacing

What this means for Singapore skin

In Fitzpatrick III to V skin, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation is the main concern. Pico is often the first choice for discrete spots in darker skin, as its heat component is lower. Low-fluence 1064 nm toning is also workable in Singapore skin. But a careless picosecond treatment can darken pigment just as a nanosecond one can. Fluence, spot size, number of passes, interval and sun exposure all change the outcome, whichever pulse is used. The device name matters less than how it is set and paced.

Melasma is a separate question

Melasma is managed rather than removed. Hormonal, vascular and ultraviolet factors drive it, and no laser addresses those. Heat can trigger it. So any laser is an add-on to diagnosis, sun protection and topical therapy. Aggressive settings are declined, whichever pulse is used. See melasma treatment.

Who should wait

Deferred

A recent tan or sunburn, active infection or inflammation in the area, photosensitising medicines, a keloid tendency, or pregnancy.

Examined first

Any changing, bleeding or irregular mark must be examined and referred for dermatological assessment first.

Diagnosis

Sun spots, freckles, brown acne marks and melasma are planned differently, so the type of pigment is established before a laser is chosen.

What neither laser can do

Stop the cause

Lasers break up existing pigment. They do not address why the skin produced it.

Remove melasma

It can only be managed, and any laser is an add-on.

Run indefinitely

Toning does not run on an open-ended schedule. The plan has a stopping point.

Risks of either laser

Darkening

Both carry a risk of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation.

Pale spots

These can follow repeated toning.

Crusting

This can occur with either pulse type.

Excess energy

Too much energy can cause blistering or texture change.

Sessions, recovery and fees

No fixed session count or recovery period is given. Response is assessed between visits, which are paced with strict sun protection. Fees depend on the type and extent of pigment and on staging, and they are set out in writing after consultation. No prices are listed. Dr Sin Yong performs treatment personally after assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is better for every mark. Pico is often first for discrete spots, and low-fluence 1064 nm toning is used for diffuse tone.
Its heat component is lower, but it can still darken skin. Fluence, passes, interval and sun all matter.
Only as a conservative add-on. Melasma is managed rather than removed, and aggressive settings are declined.
No. Pulse width and wavelength are chosen per mark and per visit, after examination.
It can. Lasers break up existing pigment but do not address why the skin produced it.
No number is fixed. The response is assessed between visits, and the plan has a stopping point.
Yes. Low-fluence 1064 nm toning is workable in Singapore skin, and the DEKA TORO includes nanosecond emissions.
SY
Dr Sin Yong
MBBS (NUS) · MRCS (Edinburgh)
MSc Aesthetic Medicine (QMUL) · MSc Practical Dermatology (Cardiff)
Aesthetic physician registered with the Singapore Medical Council.

Have your pigment examined

Dr Sin Yong will examine you, explain your options and give any fee in writing.

WhatsApp the Clinic

References

  1. Huang Y, et al. Successful Treatment of Freckles Using a 730-nm Picosecond Laser: A Prospective Study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024;17:3027-3032. View source · DOI · PMID 39741582
  2. Harnchoowong S, et al. Cosmetic Considerations in Dark-Skinned Patients. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024;17:259-277. View source · DOI · PMID 38321987
  3. Lee YS, et al. The Low-Fluence Q-Switched Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Melasma: A Systematic Review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022;58(7):936. View source · DOI
  4. Liang S, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of picosecond Nd:YAG laser (1,064 nm), picosecond alexandrite laser (755 nm) and 2% hydroquinone cream in the treatment of melasma: A randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded trial. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1132823. View source · DOI
  5. Puaratanaarunkon T, Asawanonda P A Randomized, Double Blinded, Split-Face Study of the Efficacy of Using a Broad Spectrum Sunscreen with Anti-Inflammatory Agent to Reduce Post Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation After Picosecond Laser. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022;15:331-337. View source · DOI
  6. Dai R, et al. Comparison of 1064-nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser using fractional micro-lens array vs. ablative fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG laser for the treatment of atrophic acne scar in Asians: a 20-week prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled pilot study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1248831. View source · DOI · PMID 38034535

Studies may involve other devices or protocols, and they do not predict your own result. See our evidence library and editorial policy.

Related Treatments

Last updated 3 November 2026. General information only. Results vary between individuals. Images are illustrative and do not show patients.