Skin quality · Injectables · Comparison

Rejuran vs Profhilo

Repair signalling, or hydration and bounce

Both are injected for skin quality. They contain different substances and are aimed at different skin. Neither adds volume or lifts. Results vary.

Exam
Before Any Plan
Doctor
Examines You First
Written
Quote After Exam
Orchard
By Appointment

In Brief

Rejuran vs Profhilo is a choice between polynucleotide for damaged or textured skin and hyaluronic acid for hydration and bounce. Rejuran may suit fine lines and post-acne skin. Profhilo may suit crepey, dull or thin skin. Neither adds volume or lifts. Results vary.

About This Treatment

The short answer

Rejuran and Profhilo are both injectable skin treatments, but they are not the same kind of product. Rejuran is a polynucleotide preparation purified from salmon DNA. Profhilo is an uncrosslinked hyaluronic acid.

Rejuran may come first where skin is damaged or inflamed. Skin creams and masks carrying the Rejuran name are cosmetics, not the injectable treatment. A consultation decides whether either is advised.

Rejuran vs Profhilo at a glance

RejuranProfhilo
MakerPharmaResearch, KoreaIBSA
ActivePolynucleotide, about 20 mg/mL in the standard facial preparationHyaluronic acid, 32 mg each of high and low molecular weight per 2 mL syringe
Directed atTexture, fine lines, elasticity, post-acne skin, thin under-eye skinCrepey, dull, thin or dehydrated skin, including neck and hands
PlacementIntradermal micro-injections, by fine needle or injector deviceSet Bio Aesthetic Points per side, spreading through the subcutaneous plane
Key allergy checkFish or salmon allergyAllergy to hyaluronic acid or any component

Preparations of Rejuran

Healer

The standard facial preparation.

S

Higher viscosity, placed into and around scars as part of acne scar care.

I

Lower viscosity, for thin skin around the eyes.

HB

Polynucleotide combined with hyaluronic acid.

How the choice is made

Damaged, inflamed or textured skin leans towards Rejuran. It does not hydrate as hyaluronic acid does. Skin that is mainly dull, thin or dehydrated leans towards Profhilo, which is a bio-remodelling product, not a dermal filler. Dr Sin Yong uses a modified placement for Profhilo, keeping the standard points as the safety framework, and adding placement according to face shape. He may also place it into scarred skin. On evidence, a 2025 systematic review of polynucleotide found nine studies with 219 patients, all of low or moderate quality. A 2022 split-face trial of 27 people found no significant difference in visual scores between polynucleotide and non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid around the eyes. None of these studies measured volume, lift or pigment.

Who should wait or avoid them

Both

Pregnancy or breastfeeding, and infection or inflamed skin at the site. Treatment is deferred.

Rejuran

A fish or salmon allergy is assessed carefully, or a different skin booster is chosen.

Profhilo

A known allergy to hyaluronic acid or any component.

Weighed first

Keloid tendency, blood thinners or a bleeding tendency. For Rejuran, allergy to topical anaesthetic. For Profhilo, autoimmune disease, severe allergy history and earlier non-dissolvable filler.

What neither can do

Neither adds volume or lifts. Neither treats pigment or changes pore size. Rejuran does not correct dark circles caused by structure, and it does not release tethered or fixed-wall scars, which need subcision or resurfacing. Profhilo does not correct a hollow cheek, flat bridge or receded chin, and it does not hold a contour. Jowling or a loose jawline is referred to energy treatment such as HIFU or radiofrequency.

Risks and recovery

Common to both

Small raised bumps at injection points, swelling, tenderness and bruising. These settle over the following days, and changes develop gradually.

Rejuran

Less often, nodules where product sits unevenly or too superficially, and infection. Rarely, allergic reaction. Persistent bumps are scanned by ultrasound.

Profhilo

Less often, lumps, infection and allergic reaction. Serious risks are vascular, linked to placement near facial vessels.

Get help the same day

Increasing pain, spreading redness, pale or mottled skin, or fever. For vision changes or eye pain, call 995.

Sessions and fees

Neither has a fixed session count here. For Rejuran, any interval is set at review. For Profhilo, more than one visit may be advised, and a second placement is timed at review. Fees depend on area, product or preparation, amount used, delivery, any combination and staging. A written quote follows consultation, and no prices are listed. Treatment for appearance is not claimable under MediSave or MediShield Life.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is better overall. Rejuran is directed at damaged or textured skin, and Profhilo at hydration and bounce.
No. It is classed as bio-remodelling. It adds no volume or projection.
A fish or salmon allergy is assessed carefully, or a different skin booster is chosen.
No. Neither adds volume or lifts. Jowling or a loose jawline is assessed for energy treatment.
A plan may include more than one treatment. Rejuran may come first where skin is damaged or inflamed.
There is no fixed number. Any repeat or interval is decided at review.
SY
Dr Sin Yong
MBBS (NUS) · MRCS (Edinburgh)
MSc Aesthetic Medicine (QMUL) · MSc Practical Dermatology (Cardiff)
Aesthetic physician registered with the Singapore Medical Council.

Ask which suits your skin

Dr Sin Yong will examine you, explain your options and give any fee in writing.

WhatsApp the Clinic

References

  1. Lee KWA, et al. Polynucleotides in Aesthetic Medicine: A Review of Current Practices and Perceived Effectiveness. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(15):8224. View source
  2. Sparavigna A, Tenconi B. Efficacy and tolerance of an injectable medical device containing stable hybrid cooperative complexes of high- and low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid: a monocentric 16 weeks open-label evaluation. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016;9:297-305. View source
  3. Ghatge AS, Ghatge SB. The Effectiveness of Injectable Hyaluronic Acid in the Improvement of the Facial Skin Quality: A Systematic Review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023;16:891-899. View source
  4. Khan RS, Hafeez K. Hyaluronic Acid Fillers Versus Polynucleotides for Under-Eye Rejuvenation. J Clin Med. 2026;15(13):4971. View source
  5. Koppert E, et al. Hybrid cooperative complex treatment is associated with reduced facial pore size in a pilot study. Sci Rep. 2026;16:26913. View source
  6. Cheng H, et al. A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Assessor-Blinded Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Injectable Non-Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid for Improving Facial Skin Rejuvenation. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2026;19:1-10 (article 590699). View source

Studies may involve other devices or protocols, and they do not predict your own result. See our evidence library and editorial policy.

Related Treatments

Last updated 3 November 2026. General information only. Results vary between individuals. Images are illustrative and do not show patients.